With so few venues for shorts, there should be more films like this. The aptly titled Wild Tales is a anthology film that brings together half a dozen stories, otherwise unrelated, that all stem from the brain of Argentinian director Damián Szifron. To be sure, some elements show up in multiple stories — revenge, characters turning smaller problems into larger ones, violent reactions, issues surrounding motor vehicles — but the only thing that truly ties them together is Szifron, whose penchant for creative plot turns and mordant humor makes this a tasty cinematic buffet.
Typical is the brief pre-credit story: A model meets a music professor on a plane, and it turns out they have a common acquaintance…but maybe that’s no coincidence. In a later episode, perhaps the most clever and visually arresting, a minor road rage incident also turns into something more. In each case, Szifron dispenses with lengthy set-ups and puts the viewer right into the story.
The plot twists and humor in each of them takes nothing away from the emotions of the main characters. Even if you wouldn’t go as far as they do to resolve their problems, you’ll identify a little bit with them, or at any rate laugh at them. One actor, Ricardo Darín, has also starred in Nine Queens and The Secret in Their Eyes, two other excellent Argentinian films.
IMDb link
viewed 4/29/15 at Ritz Bourse and posted 4/29/15
Showing posts with label automobile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label automobile. Show all posts
Friday, March 13, 2015
Friday, August 14, 2009
The Goods: Live Hard * Sell Hard (**)
An awkwardly titled comedy with the grating Jeremy Piven as the leader of a guns-for-hire team of sales folks who aim to rescue a family-owned car dealership in a no-holds-barred weekend sale. I have no idea if such folks exist, but I’m pretty sure no one c0nnected with the script knows anything more about selling cars than a couple of Google searches would turn up. No, the main idea is to present a bunch of people acting outrageous. The lone female, for example, lusts after the dealership owner’s son, who is supposedly ten years old but trapped in the body of a thirty-year-old. Heee-larious?
Some of this is fairly funny for a bit, depending on your taste for the tasteless, but when the old salesman makes his fifth or sixth racist/sexist comment it ceases to be daring or outrageous and becomes merely tiresome. Then you start to notice that all of the characters, even Piven’s, are pretty one-dimensional and the plotting is out of a Comedy Movie 101 course.
IMDB link
viewed at screening [Bridge] and reviewed 8/15/09
Some of this is fairly funny for a bit, depending on your taste for the tasteless, but when the old salesman makes his fifth or sixth racist/sexist comment it ceases to be daring or outrageous and becomes merely tiresome. Then you start to notice that all of the characters, even Piven’s, are pretty one-dimensional and the plotting is out of a Comedy Movie 101 course.
IMDB link
viewed at screening [Bridge] and reviewed 8/15/09
Labels:
automobile,
California,
comedy,
contest,
salesperson
Friday, October 3, 2008
Flash of Genius (***1/2)
This movie’s subject, Robert Kearns (Greg Kinnear), is barely a footnote in history, but an illustrative one. He is less known as the inventor of the intermittent windshield wiper than for the lengthy legal battle he fought to be acknowledged as such.
Kearns, an engineer, is both selfish and completely right in his fight with the Ford Motor Company, which consumes him to the point that it threatens his relationship with his wife (Lauren Graham) and children. That’s the contradiction explored here and what makes it a cut above the typical underdog drama. The screenplay by Philip Railsback does a good job of summarizing the history of Kearns’s invention and his crusade for recognition. A non-lawyer will have some idea of why it can take so long for the wheels of justice to turn. It seems more authentic in this respect than the still-worthwhile North Country, the most similar film I can think of. (That was about sex discrimination.)
There was only one time watching this movie where I said, no, I can’t imagine it happened like that, and that was when Kearns apparently learns his invention was stolen only when he drives down the highway and sees someone using it. About the only other inauthentic thing is the timeline, which the movie slightly fudges, along with Kearns’s age. This is no big deal, but a stronger period feel would have have made the story even richer. Despite the title, the movie is not at all flashy, and so not similar to Tucker: The Man and His Dream, another automobile-related biography, but of a larger-than-life sort of individual. Here, Kearns is a both an everyman character, lately a specialty for Kinnear, and a man of extraordinary persistence. The portrayal is sympathetic, but some people may find him foolishly uncompromising. In any case, they will wonder how far they would go to defend a principle, and be reminded that, no matter what decision they would make, something must be sacrificed, even if it is only time. Thus the movie is bittersweet, and therefore, to me, unexpectedly moving.
IMDB link
viewed 9/11/08 (screening at Ritz East); reviewed
Kearns, an engineer, is both selfish and completely right in his fight with the Ford Motor Company, which consumes him to the point that it threatens his relationship with his wife (Lauren Graham) and children. That’s the contradiction explored here and what makes it a cut above the typical underdog drama. The screenplay by Philip Railsback does a good job of summarizing the history of Kearns’s invention and his crusade for recognition. A non-lawyer will have some idea of why it can take so long for the wheels of justice to turn. It seems more authentic in this respect than the still-worthwhile North Country, the most similar film I can think of. (That was about sex discrimination.)
There was only one time watching this movie where I said, no, I can’t imagine it happened like that, and that was when Kearns apparently learns his invention was stolen only when he drives down the highway and sees someone using it. About the only other inauthentic thing is the timeline, which the movie slightly fudges, along with Kearns’s age. This is no big deal, but a stronger period feel would have have made the story even richer. Despite the title, the movie is not at all flashy, and so not similar to Tucker: The Man and His Dream, another automobile-related biography, but of a larger-than-life sort of individual. Here, Kearns is a both an everyman character, lately a specialty for Kinnear, and a man of extraordinary persistence. The portrayal is sympathetic, but some people may find him foolishly uncompromising. In any case, they will wonder how far they would go to defend a principle, and be reminded that, no matter what decision they would make, something must be sacrificed, even if it is only time. Thus the movie is bittersweet, and therefore, to me, unexpectedly moving.
IMDB link
viewed 9/11/08 (screening at Ritz East); reviewed
Labels:
1970s,
automobile,
biography,
courtroom,
Detroit,
drama,
engineer,
inventor,
marriage,
patent infringement,
true story
Friday, July 21, 2006
Who Killed the Electric Car (***1/2)
-->
Filmmaker Chris Paine delves into the
curious mystery behind GM’s decision to produce, then recall, its entire fleet
of EV1 electric vehicles.
When I was growing up, I remember hearing a story that there
actually existed a tire that would never wear out, only the tire companies had
bought the rights so as to preserve their profits. This movie documents a
true-life story something like that. The “killed” in the title is no hyperbole,
as most of the cars in question were literally crushed between 2003 and 2005.
You might be forgiven for not knowing that there had been any electric cars
marketed since the internal combustion engine became the technology of choice
in the 1920s. The movie mostly tells the story of the EV1, the General Motors
vehicle that was designed from the ground up and represented the first entry in
the potential new market. It was GM’s prototype that originally inspired
California to pass since-revoked legislation requiring 10% of vehicles sold in
the state to have zero emissions by 2003. Interviews with some people involved
in the GM project, politicians, automotive experts, and EV1 owners (most
notably Mel Gibson) form the basis of the film. What the movie lacks in
innovative techniques it makes up for in the story it tells and the way it’s
carefully structured as a mystery. The oil companies and recent presidential
administrations come in for predictable criticism, but the more interesting
question answered in the movie is why the automaker would create a car and then
do so little to sell it to the public. Whoever did this killing, I came away
from the movie mourning the loss.
Friday, June 9, 2006
Cars (**3/4)
Pixar Animation’s seventh feature film is
also its weakest, set in a world where everyone’s a car, the humor is tepid,
and life is about as exciting as watching auto racing on TV. Okay, not that
dull.
This is the seventh in a string of wildly successful features
released by Pixar Animation Studios, now owned by Disney. All of the earlier
ones (the Toy Story movies, A Bug’s Life, Monsters, Inc., Finding
Nemo, and The Incredibles) have not only been big hits, but are
beloved by audiences and critics alike. Cars, directed by Toy Story’s
John Lasseter, has the top-notch computer animation that no doubt goes part way
to explaining Pixar’s success. But story-wise, it’s a dodgier affair.
It begins with an auto race, where we can see that the cars are driving
themselves, and that the audience too consists of cars. Everyone’s a car, but
the fastest is cocky Lightning McQueen (Owen Wilson). In the film’s only
memorable line, he nicknames his chief rival “Thunder,” noting that “thunder
comes after lightning.” But pride goeth before a fall, and so Lightning must
learn an Important Lesson about needing others. This he learns from the forlorn
folks in a left-behind town on old Route 66 (the old song’s heard in two
versions), most notably the old racer appealing voiced by Paul Newman. Cars
isn’t awful, but it’s less funny and probably has less all-ages appeal than the
other Pixar flicks. It also continues the Pixar pattern of giving much more
prominence to the male characters (The Incredibles being an exception).
Bonnie Hunt plays a lawyer who doubles as a sort of love interest for
Lightning, but all the physical work is done by the he-cars. (The racers are
all male, too.) Hunt’s paean to the pre-Interstate highway system is more
touching than anything else. The theatrical release of Cars was preceded
by the charming, Academy Award-nominated short One Man Band.
Labels:
animated,
auto racing,
automobile,
comedy,
family film,
rivals
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)