McKay and Ferrell’s schtick is to let the jokes fly and see what sticks, with the force of the delivery sometimes compensating for half-funny lines, sometimes merely emphasizing the lame ones. “Who the hell is Julius Caesar?…I don’t follow the NBA,” is the kind of exchange that half the audience will be amused at, and half will groan at. I’m sure the people who like the movie will disagree about which lines worked and which fell flat. One thing I found incredibly tedious was an entire subplot involving Ron’s new boss, who is, somewhat implausibly, a 30ish black woman (Meagan Good). Besides creating another female role, the character seems mostly to exist to provide an excuse for lame jokes about race. Time was when plain old racist jokes were acceptable; the modern substitute is to make jokes about racists. This itself became tiresome years ago. Maybe because the movie takes place in the early 1980s (the hits-laden soundtrack keeps reminding us) it seemed somehow fresh to have a scene with Burgundy, invited by the boss to dinner, trotting out “jive talk” in an effort to seem “hip” and “down with it,” but in fact it was as painful to look at as all the quoted phrases I just used.
The original Anchorman lacked a real satirical bite but was pretty
funny. This sequel, with a better satirical target, since the 24-hour news
culture is still very much with us, still mostly lacks satirical bite. Burgundy is the Inspector Clouseau of the news world, spontaneously or accidentally coming up with most of
the dubious innovations of the post-cable TV news world — traffic chases
on camera, Fox-News-style superpatriotism, focus on celebrities, etc. But beyond that the movie doesn’t have anything to say about those developments. It is simply a silly movie.
Now, being silly is okay. Interrupting the story with the odd fantasy sequence can be fun. And if the
main characters are caricatures of womanizers, jerks, and idiots, I’m
okay with that, too. But then, don’t show me that for 90 minutes and then
follow up with a soppy, sentimental conclusion that asks me to have a
big soft spot for these people,
one that has them suddenly, and unconvincingly, developing a conscience
(and/or a brain). And don’t have a big climax, an
overblown successor to the West-Side Story style gang fight in the
original, that is much more
impressive for its guest-star roster than its humor quotient.
McKay and Ferrell are not going through the motions here. Instead, it seems like they may have tried too hard. If you’re into the kind of humor in the first Anchorman, you’ll probably laugh at something or other here. I’d bet there are more punch lines per minute than in almost any other comedy in recent memory (except maybe toward the end). But I’d also bet that, for most people, a lower percentage of them land.
viewed 12/4/13 at Ritz 5 [PFS screening] and posted 12/18/13 (revised 12/26/13)
It's funny, but not as drop-dead hilarious or weird as the first. Good review Adam.
ReplyDelete