Friday, May 26, 2006

X-Men: The Last Stand (***1/4)

--> In the third film in the series, a  possible “cure” for the mutants creates a new rift between humans and the X-men, raising some fascinating, though insufficiently explored, moral issues.


Would you want to be a mutant? That’s one question presented by the third film adapted from the Marvel Comics series. All of the mutants return from the second film, even the one, Famke Janssen’s Jean Grey, who seemed to have been killed. She doesn’t seem herself, though, and the movie spends some time explaining why, utilizing in part a helpful childhood flashback. In contrast to the second film, which I felt strained under the need to demonstrate all of the mutants’ powers, this one does a pretty good job of making everyone seem part of the story. Most of them seem to like being mutants, but it makes some of them, like Rogue (Anna Paquin), feel blue. Or look blue, in the case of the newly introduced character of Dr. Hank McCoy/Beast, who’s become first mutant appointed to a cabinet post. As played by Kelsey Grammer, he somehow reminded me of a hairy Hubert Humphrey, a moderate figure trying to placate two constituencies without much success. Which returns us to the recurring theme of the series as a whole. Are humans and mutants natural enemies? The mutants themselves speak in language reminiscent of the gay-rights movement. There’s nothing wrong with us, some of them say, when told they can be “cured.” 

But I was thinking of another metaphor, the gun-control debate. These superpower-possessing humans are like people with ultra-powerful, unlicensed weapons. Jean Grey herself has the power of whole armies, although the movie doesn’t explore the implications of this as thoroughly as it might. In a world where they represent an increasing proportion of the population, are “ordinary” humans bound to end up as endangered as chimpanzees? Does the mere existence of these superhumans inherently threaten everyone else, because inevitably some will do great harm, even if most don’t? Having posited these questions, at least implicitly, the film actually gives them less consideration that I had hoped for. It’s the rare thriller that I wish had been just a little bit longer. Instead, the film rather tidily uses Patrick Stewart’s Professor Xavier and Ian McKellen’s Magneto as symbols of the accomodationist and confrontational approaches to the issue. The penultimate sequence is a big special-effects action extravaganza (there’s very few action scenes before that) that mostly works, even if it wraps things up too tidily. Perhaps the more straightforward plotting is due to the replacement of director Bryan Singer with Brett Ratner (Rush Hour). Notwithstanding the caveats above, I found this at least as absorbing as the other two films. Stay to the very end of the credits for a hint about the plot of a potential fourth movie.


posted 8/16/13

No comments:

Post a Comment